Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Foot Ankle Surg ; 30(2): 117-122, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37949704

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) injections have proven effective in clinical trials for plantar fasciitis treatment but have not been directly compared. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PRP or BTX-A injections. METHODS: We performed a randomised controlled trial (59 patients; 1-year follow-up) to assess efficacy, using pain and functional scales (VAS, AOFAS Hindfoot-scale and FAAM questionnaire) and fascia thickness reduction, in control and single ultrasound-guided BTX-A or PRP injection groups. RESULTS: The BTX-A group showed better results at 1-month after treatment. Conversely, the PRP injection was more effective in the long-term, with significant pain reduction and functional improvement. Plantar fascia thickness significantly reduced from months 1 and 3 in the PRP and BTX-A groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: PRP and BTX-A injections are effective in patients with plantar fasciitis with BTX-A achieving better short-term pain reduction and PRP better long-term results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I; Randomised Controlled Trial.


Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Fascitis Plantar , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Humanos , Fascitis Plantar/terapia , Fascitis Plantar/tratamiento farmacológico , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapéutico , Dolor , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31471242

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate benefits for the patient and the economic impact for the implementation of a wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) hand surgery compared to traditional major outpatient circuit. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was planned comparing 150 cases of ambulatory hand surgery (carpal tunnel and trigger finger) using WALANT technique intervention out from the operating room; with another 150 which underwent intervention, outpatient setting, with preoperative evaluation, sedation and tourniquet, in the operation room. Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative pain was monitored, as well as the days that required postoperative analgesia.The resources used and costs were evaluated. Satisfaction was evaluated using a specific survey. RESULTS: The pain during the surgery was equivalent for both groups and was significantly lower postoperatively for the WALANT group, with less need for the use of analgesics. Satisfaction was greater for the local anesthesia group. The use of personnel resources and hospital material was less for the WALANT group, with total saving calculated by 1,019€ per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Procedures such as carpal tunnel surgery and trigger finger surgery can be safely performed using wide awake surgery. Patient satisfaction is higher to conventional procedure in the operation room. Pain control is excellent, especially during the postoperative period. WALANT technique for hand surgery represents a benefit for the patient in comfort, timeliness and no need for preoperative tests or evaluation. In addition, it represents a significant savings in hospital resources.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local , Síndrome del Túnel Carpiano/cirugía , Trastorno del Dedo en Gatillo/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...